False Claims Act Resource Center
 

Archive for the ‘Defense Industry’ Category

BOEING PAYS $4.392 MILLION TO RESOLVE FALSE CLAIMS ACT LAWSUIT OVER FRAUDULENT BILLING OF THE U.S. MILITARY ON CHINOOK HELICOPTER PROGRAM

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Philadelphia, Friday, January 20, 2012: United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Zane David Memeger and the United States Department of Justice announced today that The Boeing Company, the largest manufacturer of commercial jets and military aircraft combined, has agreed to pay $4,392,779.74 to settle a Federal False Claims Act whistleblower lawsuit brought by current Boeing employee Vincent A. DiMezza, Jr.

DiMezza, a former United States Marine, has worked for Boeing since 2007, currently serving as a Production Manager in the Chinook Helicopter Program at Boeing’s plant in Ridley Park, Pennsylvania. The United States Department of Justice joins Mr. DiMezza, who filed his whistleblower lawsuit in federal court in 2010, in alleging that Boeing has engaged in a pattern and practice of submitting false and fraudulent claims for modification work performed under a government contract with the United States Department of Defense to produce, maintain, repair and/or modify the Chinook CH-47D and MH-47 helicopters.

The U.S. Military Chinook Helicopter Program

The Chinook Helicopter is a multi-mission, heavy-lift transport helicopter. Its primary mission is to move troops, artillery, ammunition, fuel, water, barrier materials, supplies and equipment on the battlefield. Its secondary missions include medical evacuation, disaster relief, search and rescue, aircraft recovery, fire fighting, parachute drops, heavy construction and civil development.

Chinook Helicopters were introduced in 1962 as the CH-47 Chinook, and models A, B, C were deployed in Vietnam. A central element in the Gulf War, the Chinook continues to be the standard for the United States Army in the global campaign against terrorism. Since its introduction approximately 1,179 Chinook helicopters have been built.

Boeing’s Contract to Modernize U.S. Military Chinook Helicopters

Beginning in 2003, the United States Department of Defense awarded Boeing contracts to produce and modify Chinook helicopters as part of the U.S. Army’s effort to modernize its fleet of heavy lift helicopters. These contracts are identified by the Department of Defense as contracts numbers W58RG2 04 G 0023 and W58RGZ 08 C 0098. Over one hundred new Chinooks were ordered, and Boeing also agreed to “remanufacture” several hundred older Chinook helicopters by overhauling their airframes and performing extensive modifications to the avionics and engines.

Boeing’s manufacturing facility in Ridley Park, Pennsylvania and a Boeing facility in Millville, New Jersey are the principle sites where work is performed on the Chinook Modification Program.

Boeing’s Compensation for Modernization of U.S. Military Chinook Helicopters

Boeing’s contracts with the United States Department of Defense provide for Boeing to be compensated in two independent but related ways. First, Boeing receives a fixed price for work that must be completed on every airframe in order to upgrade it. Because this is the standard work required by the contract, this work is referred to as “Basic” work. Second, where there is pre-existing damage or wear to an airframe, Boeing is paid on an hourly basis to fix this damage or wear to an airframe. Such airframe specific work is referred to as “Over and Above” work. The majority of the time, Over and Above work is billed to the government based on an estimate of how long a given repair will take to complete. This estimate is agreed upon by the United States and Boeing. Approximately one third of the time, however, in cases in which the United States and Boeing cannot agree on an estimate before the work is complete, the Over and Above work is billed to the United States based on the time that Boeing’s employees reported actually spending on that job.

Boeing tracks the work of its mechanics and allocates their time to the bills submitted to the United States by way of a computer system. Each individual job to be completed as a part of either the Basic or Over and Above work is given an identifying number. When beginning a job, a mechanic swipes his or her unique badge at a scanner and identifies on the system the job that he or she will be doing, a process known as “badging in.” At the conclusion of work on that job, the mechanic either “badges out” of that job, i.e. swipes his or her unique badge and indicates that the job or his or her work on the job is complete, or he or she badges in to another job, which automatically stops the clock running on the first job and starts a clock running on the new job.

Boeing’s Fraudulent Billing of Work on U.S. Military Chinook Helicopters

Mr. DiMezza’s whistleblower lawsuit alleged that since at least 2003, Boeing has engaged in a scheme to fraudulently bill the Department of Defense for inflated hours of work on Chinook Helicopters. In particular, the United States and Mr. DiMezza alleged that, between 2005 and the present:

1. Multiple Boeing mechanics performed Basic work while they were badged in to Over and Above jobs.

2. Multiple Boeing first-line managers instructed Boeing mechanics to badge in to Over and Above jobs while they were actually performing work on Basic jobs. This allowed these managers to improve their mechanics’ apparent efficiency at performing Basic jobs, which Boeing carefully tracked and made part of their annual performance appraisal, at the expense of their mechanics’ efficiency at performing Over and Above jobs, which Boeing did not monitor in like fashion.

3. Some Boeing mechanics who completed their work on Over and Above jobs in less than the job’s estimated time began performing Basic work while still badged in to the Over and Above job, until the Over and Above job reached its estimated time.

4. At a meeting in approximately late 2005, a Boeing first-level manager instructed a number of senior mechanics at Boeing that they could remain badged in on Over and Above jobs while performing Basic work for up to four to five times the estimated hours for the Over and Above work.

5. As a result of the foregoing mis-billing, the United States paid Boeing extra for work that was already included in Boeing’s contract payment.

Details of the Settlement

Boeing has agreed to pay the United States $4,392,774.74 to settle the False Claims Act allegations raised by Mr. DiMezza, which were joined by the United States. In addition, Boeing further agrees as part of the Settlement to undertake significant changes at its Ridley Park, Pennsylvania plant designed to prevent similar overbilling to the Department of Defense in the future. Those remedial measures include: modifications to Boeing’s manufacturing systems to prevent overbilling Over and Above work; implementation of measures to review the efficiency of Over and Above works; and additional compliance training for employees.

Pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act, Mr. DiMezza is entitled to receive 15% to 25% of the United States’ recovery for reporting Boeing’s fraudulent overbilling scheme to the United States. In addition, the False Claims Act requires Boeing to pay Mr. DiMezza’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs expended in the prosecution of this case. The Court has scheduled a hearing on the settlement agreement for February 27, 2012.

Mr. DiMezza is represented by Marc S. Raspanti, Michael A. Morse, and Christopher A. Iacono, of the national whistleblower law firm of Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP. Michael Morse, a former prosecutor and current chair of the law firm’s national whistleblower practice, applauded the courage and tenacity of Mr. DiMezza. “Mr. DiMezza has exhibited tremendous courage in blowing-the-whistle on the substantial overbilling by Boeing on the Chinook Helicopter Program. As a former United States Marine, Mr. DiMezza was especially disturbed that this overbilling repeatedly occurred on military aircraft of such importance to our men and women in uniform around the world. Mr. DiMezza, and the members of our firm’s whistleblower practice group, spent hundreds of hours working to expose this complex billing scheme and supporting all aspects of the government’s investigation. Today’s settlement would not have been possible without Mr. DiMezza’s courage and his refusal to simply look the other way.” United States Attorney Zane David Memeger likewise complimented Mr. DiMezza for coming forward in this case.

Marc Raspanti, the founder of the law firm’s whistleblower practice, applauded the work of the federal prosecutors who spearheaded the government’s enforcement efforts in this complex case: Assistant United States Attorneys Paul Kaufman and Gregory David. Mr. Raspanti also applauded the efforts of the investigators from the Defense Criminal Investigative Service who contributed significantly to the investigation of Mr. DiMezza’s complex whistleblower case. “The close partnership between Mr. DiMezza, his attorneys, and the tenacious federal prosecutors and investigators was essential to the successful recovery reached in this complex case. This is precisely the type of private-government partnership envisioned by the False Claims Act when it was substantially amended in 1986.”

The Federal False Claims Act

The False Claims Act allows private persons (known as “relators”) to file a lawsuit against those business and individuals that have directly or indirectly defrauded the federal government. The False Claims Act was enacted by Congress at the request of President Lincoln, who signed it into law on March 2, 1863. The Act was strengthened in 1986, and again with amendments enacted in 2009 and 2010. The Act is the government’s primary tool against fraud by its contractors, as evidenced by the recovery of more than $28 billion since 1986.

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP, is one of the largest and most successful whistleblower law firms in the United States. Lawyers in the nationwide whistleblower practice group of Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti have served as lead or co-lead counsel in numerous whistleblower cases that have recovered more than $1 billion for federal and state taxpayers. For more information on the Federal False Claims Act, State False Claims Acts, SEC Whistleblower Program, the IRS Whistleblower Reward Program, or the nationwide whistleblower practice of Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, visit www.falseclaimsact.com, www.pietragallo.com, www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com, or call (215) 320-6200.

  • Share/Bookmark

World’s Largest Shipping Firm Agrees to Pay Federal Government $31.9 Million

Monday, January 9th, 2012

To resolve allegations of submitting false claims, Norfolk-based Maersk Line Limited and its Danish affiliate, Maersk Line, agreed to a global settlement of $31.9 million to the federal government.  It was alleged that Maersk “knowingly overcharged the Department of Defense to transport thousands of containers from ports to inland delivery destinations in Iraq and Afghanistan,” per an announcement released from the Justice Department.  The federal government also alleged that the company had overcharged for late fees by “failing to account for cargo transit times and a contractual grace period.”  In August of 2011, USA Today reported that Maersk Line Limited is “one of the top recipients of late fees.”

The U.S. Department of Justice announced this settlement on January 3, 2012.  James Philbin, attorney for Maersk, stated that the suit was first filed in 2004 by a former employee of shipping company APL, which was filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.  In 2007, the lawsuit was amended to include Maersk as a defendant.  Philbin asserts that upon first becoming aware of the allegations, Maersk conducted an extensive internal investigation and willingly disclosed all discovered information to the U.S. Military and the Department of Justice.

For more information see:  http://hamptonroads.com/2012/01/maersk-pay-federal-government-319-million

  • Share/Bookmark

Saudi Company Pays for its Illegal Kickback Scheme to Obtain Army Contracts in the Middle East

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

Tamimi Global Company Ltd. (TAFGA), a Saudi Arabian company, agreed to pay $13 million to the U.S. government to settle criminal and civil allegations that it paid illegal kickbacks and gratuities to a KBR employee to obtain a U.S. Army subcontract. Specifically, TAFGA paid KBR subcontract manager Steven Lowell Seamans $133,000 in kickbacks to get preferential treatment for the award of a subcontract to provide dining services in Camp Arifjan in Kuwait under KBR’s LOGCAP (Logistics Civil Augmentation Program) III contract. TAFGA also admitted paying illegal gratuities to the Army Sergeant in charge of food services at Camp Arifjan to receive favorable treatment in the contract’s performance. As part of a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorneys Office to settle the criminal allegations against it, TAFGA will pay $5.6 million and agree to institute a strict compliance program to ensure that its employees strictly follow government contract legal and ethical standards. TAFGA will also pay $7.4 million to the U.S. to resolve civil violations of the False Claims Act and the Anti-Kickback Statute for its payment of illegal kickbacks.

For more information see: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/September/11-civ-1226.html

  • Share/Bookmark

Former US Army Sergeant Pleads Guilty to Theft of Equipment in Iraq

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

A former US Army Sergeant pleaded guilty to theft of US government equipment during time he spent in Iraq training the Iraqi Army units.  Robert Ashley Nelson pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to steal public property for his role in stealing eight generators from an Army base, which he then sold for approximately $44,830. 

For more information, please go to the following link:  http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/June/11-crm-848.html.

  • Share/Bookmark

Father-Son Duo Indicted in Multimillion-Dollar Military Contract Bribery Scheme

Friday, June 3rd, 2011

Two American businessmen, George H. Lee and his son, Justin W. Lee, have been charged with giving U.S. Army officers airline tickets, vacations, and over $1 million in bribes to secure multimillion-dollar contracts to provide supplies to the U.S. military and to help rebuild Iraq.  Their indictment was unsealed on May 27, 2011.

The Lees join a group of almost 60 contractors and military officers to face criminal charges related to misconduct in obtaining a variety of government contracts in the early part of the Iraq war.  Their involvement in the Iraqi contracting scandal has been known for some time, as their company, Lee Dynamics International, has been barred from doing business with the federal government since July 2007.

Documents filed in the criminal proceeding against George and Justin Lee allege that the Lees provided $225,000 in bribes to one unnamed Army Major (identified as “Person One”) in exchange for the officer directing over $14 million in contracts to Lee Dynamics.  The description of “Person One” in the indictment closely matches that of Maj. Gloria D. Davis, who shot and killed herself in Baghdad in December 2006 after admitting to investigators that she had taken the $225,000 in bribes from the Lees’ company.

The indictment also ties the Lees to another corrupt Army officer, Maj. John Cockerham, who was recently sentenced to 17 years in prison for taking over $9.6 million in bribes while working at a contracting office in Kuwait.  The government has charged George and Justin Lee with providing at least $1 million to Major Cockerham in exchange for being funneled contracts to provide American troops with bottled water, bunk beds, and mattresses.

For more information see:  http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/world/middleeast/31iraq.html?_r=1

  • Share/Bookmark

Dyncorp International LLC and The Sandi Group to Pay $8.7 Million to the U.S. Government

Friday, May 6th, 2011

Dyncorp International LLC and its subcontractor, The Sandi Group, were charged with allegations of submitting false claims for payment under Dyncorp’s contract with the Department of State to provide civilian police training in Iraq.  The qui tam lawsuit was filed by two former TSG employees, which alleged that Dyncorp was submitting inflated claims for the construction of container camps at various locations in Iraq and that TSG was seeking reimbursement for danger pay that it falsely claimed to have paid its U.S. expatriate employees working in Iraq.  Dyncorp will pay the United States $7.7 million and TSG will pay $1.01 million. 

For more information see: http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/April/11-civ-513.html

  • Share/Bookmark

War Zone Contractor Accused of Billing Taxpayers for Personal Security

Friday, April 8th, 2011

The Justice Department recently filed a False Claims Act action against engineering and construction firm KBR, Inc., the prime contractor on the Army’s Logistics Civil Augmentation Program III contract. As the prime contractor, KBR provided logistics support services to US troops stationed in Iraq. Prior to the filing of the False Claims Act action, the Army had disallowed $103 million in costs incurred by KBR, stating that the costs were related to KBR and its subcontractors hiring personal security personnel, which is prohibited under the government contract. KBR appealed the decision, and shortly thereafter, was slapped with the False Claims Act action by the Justice Department.

Though the security needs of the contractors were to be provided by the Army, KBR allegedly hired three personal security guards and armed a limited number of its own personnel. The Justice Department claims KBR did so without the necessary authorization and then knowingly charged the Army for the cost of the private security, despite it being prohibited by their contract. The case is sure to be contentious, as KBR has already filed a Motion to Dismiss and the Justice Department has countered with a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.

For more information see:  http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/blog/fedbiz_daily/2011/03/the-hidden-cost-of-employee-protection.html

  • Share/Bookmark

CDI agrees to settle False Claims Act suit for labor charges for $1.95 million

Wednesday, December 15th, 2010

CDI, a Philadelphia supplier of engineering services on commercial and military projects, agreed to settle a false claims act lawsuit based on claims of mischarged labor costs for the period from January 2001 through December 2006.  An investigation revealed that CDI directed billing of labor costs (at increments less than .5 hours to evade detection) to be reimbursed by the military for work that was never done.  The qui tam relator was a former CDI employee in CDI’s regional office in Sharonville, Ohio. 

For more information see: http://www.thecypresstimes.com/article/News/National_News/
PHILADELPHIABASED_CDI_CORPORATION_SETTLES_FALSE_CLAIMS_ACT_ALLEGATIONS/36704

  • Share/Bookmark

United States Sues Kaman Dayron, Inc., Under False Claims Act

Friday, November 20th, 2009

The US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit under the False Claims Act against defense contractor Kaman Dayron, Inc. for allegedly substituting non-conforming parts in sophisticated ignition devices supplied in “bunker buster” bombs.  The lawsuit contends that Kaman Dayron knowingly substituted non-conforming parts that might cause the ignition devices to fire prematurely, causing warhead misfires. 

The case is being prosecuted under the National Procurement Fraud Initiative, which was created in 2006 to promote the early detection and prosecution of procurement fraud in government contracting for national security. 

More information can be found at the following link:  http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/united-states-sues-kaman-dayron-inc-under-false-claims-act,1033336.shtml

  • Share/Bookmark

U.S. Sues Canadian Firm Over Bullet Vests

Friday, November 20th, 2009

The US Department of Justice sued a seller of bullet-proof vests, and several of manufacturers of component parts of the vests under the False Claims Act claiming that the vests were defective. The DOJ sued Lincoln Fabrics, Ltd. of Canada and its American subsidiary, Toyobo Co., Honeywell International, Inc. and others, The DOJ claimed that not only did the woven fabric, known as Zylon, degrade quickly over time, and particularly in hot and humid weather, but that the manufacturers were aware of the defect.

More information about the lawsuit can be found here: http://www.upi.com/Busines_News/2009/10/31/Us-sues-Canadian-firm-over-bullet-vests/UPI-12481257016735/

  • Share/Bookmark
 

 
Blog Home   |   Website Home   |   Our Practice   |   State False Claims Acts   |   Common Types of Fraud   |   Contact Us
 
215-320-6200
© 2012 False Claims Act. All rights reserved. | Blog by LISI
Attorney Advertising
The information on this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.