<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>False Claims Act - Whistleblowers Blog&#187; False Claims Act &#8211; Whistleblowers Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/category/government-contracts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:49:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Hampshire-Based Red River Computer Co. Agrees to Pay $2.3 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/new-hampshire-based-red-river-computer-co-agrees-to-pay-2-3-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/new-hampshire-based-red-river-computer-co-agrees-to-pay-2-3-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John P. Kacavas, the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Hampshire, announced that Red River Computer Co., Inc. has agreed to pay $2.3 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act.  The allegations relate to Red River Computer Co’s business with various federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Defense, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John P. Kacavas, the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Hampshire, announced that Red River Computer Co., Inc. has agreed to pay $2.3 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act.  The allegations relate to Red River Computer Co’s business with various federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Library of Congress and the General Services Administration. </p>
<p>An investigation by the United States identified concerns with respect to dozens of contracts that Red River had with the government, including instances where Red River contracted to provide a particular good or service, but failed to do so despite being paid.  Red River cooperated in the government’s investigation. </p>
<p>Read more at <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/boston/press-releases/2011/new-hampshire-based-red-river-computer-co.-agrees-to-pay-2.3-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations">http://www.fbi.gov/boston/press-releases/2011/new-hampshire-based-red-river-computer-co.-agrees-to-pay-2.3-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Fnew-hampshire-based-red-river-computer-co-agrees-to-pay-2-3-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations&amp;linkname=New%20Hampshire-Based%20Red%20River%20Computer%20Co.%20Agrees%20to%20Pay%20%242.3%20Million%20to%20Resolve%20False%20Claims%20Act%20Allegations"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/new-hampshire-based-red-river-computer-co-agrees-to-pay-2-3-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agility in more hot water over military food fraud claims</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/agility-in-more-hot-water-over-military-food-fraud-claims</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/agility-in-more-hot-water-over-military-food-fraud-claims#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Kuwaiti food supplier could face charges of defrauding the U.S. government as federal prosecutors investigate claims against The Public Warehouse Company, also known as Agility. The alleged fraud is to the tune of $68 million, and involves a complex scheme of funding formulas used to defraud contracts to supply troops in Iraq, Kuwait and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">A Kuwaiti food supplier could face charges of defrauding the U.S. government as federal prosecutors investigate claims against The Public Warehouse Company, also known as Agility. The alleged fraud is to the tune of $68 million, and involves a complex scheme of funding formulas used to defraud contracts to supply troops in Iraq, Kuwait and Jordan. The indictment was originally released in November 2009, but has become more active of late and ignited controversy when the government subpoenaed ex-Army Major General Dan Mongeon, who is now a unit CEO at Agility. </p>
<p>Agility is accused of submitting false invoices to a logistics center, and inflating prices since 2003. Prosecutors claim that Agility received rebates and discounts from vendors that it did not pass on to the government in accordance with their contract. Additionally, prosecutors allege the company asked vendors to manipulate the product packaging so it could bill the government twice as much. Agility says this is a civil contract dispute and not a criminal matter.</p>
<p> For more information see:  <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9OPG5R80.htm">http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9OPG5R80.htm</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Fagility-in-more-hot-water-over-military-food-fraud-claims&amp;linkname=Agility%20in%20more%20hot%20water%20over%20military%20food%20fraud%20claims"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/agility-in-more-hot-water-over-military-food-fraud-claims/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KBR’s request to dismiss false claim lawsuit denied</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/kbr%e2%80%99s-request-to-dismiss-false-claim-lawsuit-denied</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/kbr%e2%80%99s-request-to-dismiss-false-claim-lawsuit-denied#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth has ruled against the largest private contractor in Iraq and Afghanistan in a lawsuit brought by the U.S. government. Houston based contractor KBR Inc.’s request to dismiss a $100 million lawsuit involving false claims for private security in Iraq was denied on August 3. Judge Lamberth did dismiss claims [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth has ruled against the largest private contractor in Iraq and Afghanistan in a lawsuit brought by the U.S. government. Houston based contractor KBR Inc.’s request to dismiss a $100 million lawsuit involving false claims for private security in Iraq was denied on August 3. Judge Lamberth did dismiss claims for unjust enrichment and payment by mistake, but has allowed the government to proceed with its allegations of breach of contract and false claims. The lawsuit was filed in April 2010 for impermissible costs paid from 2003-2006. At the time, KBR and 33 subcontractors were providing logistical support for the government in Iraq and Afghanistan, including food, mail, laundry and transport services.</p>
<p>The government claims that they were billed by KBR for private security. Additionally, the government alleges that KBR violated their contract when they failed to obtain Army authorization for arming subcontractors and when they used security contractors who were not registered with the Iraqi Minister of the Interior. KBR disputes the claims, alleging that the government did not provide protection for its employees and the lawsuit is a means for the government to avoid reimbursing KBR for necessary security. KBR also cites a lack of clarity in their contract and the increasingly challenging security conditions in Iraq.</p>
<p> For more information see:  <a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08__August/Federal_judge__KBR_Iraq_false_claim_lawsuit_can_proceed/">http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_<br />
_August/Federal_judge__KBR_Iraq_false_claim_lawsuit_can_proceed/</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Fkbr%25e2%2580%2599s-request-to-dismiss-false-claim-lawsuit-denied&amp;linkname=KBR%E2%80%99s%20request%20to%20dismiss%20false%20claim%20lawsuit%20denied"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/kbr%e2%80%99s-request-to-dismiss-false-claim-lawsuit-denied/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corrupt Officials and Contractors are Charged with Taking “Time and a Half” in connection with New York’s Automated Payroll System</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/corrupt-officials-and-contractors-are-charged-with-taking-%e2%80%9ctime-and-a-half%e2%80%9d-in-connection-with-new-york%e2%80%99s-automated-payroll-system</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/corrupt-officials-and-contractors-are-charged-with-taking-%e2%80%9ctime-and-a-half%e2%80%9d-in-connection-with-new-york%e2%80%99s-automated-payroll-system#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal reports that the development of New York City’s automated payroll system &#8211; known as CityTime &#8211; was the subject of significant fraudulent kickbacks.  The US Attorney recently announced indictments of two New Jersey executives accused of paying off contractors involving over $600 million in city funds, and over $40 million in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal reports that the development of New York City’s automated payroll system &#8211; known as CityTime &#8211; was the subject of significant fraudulent kickbacks.  The US Attorney recently announced indictments of two New Jersey executives accused of paying off contractors involving over $600 million in city funds, and over $40 million in kickbacks.  In total, 11 individuals have been charged with the fraud.  The alleged corruption has proved to be an embarrassment to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and the project itself has been subject to cost overruns, which has inflated the total cost from $68 million initially to over $700 million today. </p>
<p>For more information see:  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303936704576398100826124240.html">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303936704576398100826124240.html</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Fcorrupt-officials-and-contractors-are-charged-with-taking-%25e2%2580%259ctime-and-a-half%25e2%2580%259d-in-connection-with-new-york%25e2%2580%2599s-automated-payroll-system&amp;linkname=Corrupt%20Officials%20and%20Contractors%20are%20Charged%20with%20Taking%20%E2%80%9CTime%20and%20a%20Half%E2%80%9D%20in%20connection%20with%20New%20York%E2%80%99s%20Automated%20Payroll%20System"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/corrupt-officials-and-contractors-are-charged-with-taking-%e2%80%9ctime-and-a-half%e2%80%9d-in-connection-with-new-york%e2%80%99s-automated-payroll-system/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Father-Son Duo Indicted in Multimillion-Dollar Military Contract Bribery Scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/father-son-duo-indicted-in-multimillion-dollar-military-contract-bribery-scheme</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/father-son-duo-indicted-in-multimillion-dollar-military-contract-bribery-scheme#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two American businessmen, George H. Lee and his son, Justin W. Lee, have been charged with giving U.S. Army officers airline tickets, vacations, and over $1 million in bribes to secure multimillion-dollar contracts to provide supplies to the U.S. military and to help rebuild Iraq.  Their indictment was unsealed on May 27, 2011.
The Lees join [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two American businessmen, George H. Lee and his son, Justin W. Lee, have been charged with giving U.S. Army officers airline tickets, vacations, and over $1 million in bribes to secure multimillion-dollar contracts to provide supplies to the U.S. military and to help rebuild Iraq.  Their indictment was unsealed on May 27, 2011.</p>
<p>The Lees join a group of almost 60 contractors and military officers to face criminal charges related to misconduct in obtaining a variety of government contracts in the early part of the Iraq war.  Their involvement in the Iraqi contracting scandal has been known for some time, as their company, Lee Dynamics International, has been barred from doing business with the federal government since July 2007.</p>
<p>Documents filed in the criminal proceeding against George and Justin Lee allege that the Lees provided $225,000 in bribes to one unnamed Army Major (identified as “Person One”) in exchange for the officer directing over $14 million in contracts to Lee Dynamics.  The description of “Person One” in the indictment closely matches that of Maj. Gloria D. Davis, who shot and killed herself in Baghdad in December 2006 after admitting to investigators that she had taken the $225,000 in bribes from the Lees’ company.</p>
<p>The indictment also ties the Lees to another corrupt Army officer, Maj. John Cockerham, who was recently sentenced to 17 years in prison for taking over $9.6 million in bribes while working at a contracting office in Kuwait.  The government has charged George and Justin Lee with providing at least $1 million to Major Cockerham in exchange for being funneled contracts to provide American troops with bottled water, bunk beds, and mattresses.</p>
<p>For more information see:  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/world/middleeast/31iraq.html?_r=1">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/world/middleeast/31iraq.html?_r=1</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Ffather-son-duo-indicted-in-multimillion-dollar-military-contract-bribery-scheme&amp;linkname=Father-Son%20Duo%20Indicted%20in%20Multimillion-Dollar%20Military%20Contract%20Bribery%20Scheme"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/father-son-duo-indicted-in-multimillion-dollar-military-contract-bribery-scheme/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/fighting-fraud</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/fighting-fraud#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Budetti, director of Program Integrity at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has focused his attention on fraud prevention, detection, and prosecution.  On average, between $70 billion and $234 billion is lost annually due to healthcare fraud.  Obama’s administration has also committed resources to minimizing fraud.
The number one state for healthcare fraud is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Budetti, director of Program Integrity at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has focused his attention on fraud prevention, detection, and prosecution.  On average, between $70 billion and $234 billion is lost annually due to healthcare fraud.  Obama’s administration has also committed resources to minimizing fraud.</p>
<p>The number one state for healthcare fraud is Florida, where many elders choose to retire.  The state is swarming with criminals looking to take advantage of Medicare fraud since it is so easy to become a provider under the government healthcare programs.  Learning how to electronically submit claims is fairly easy, and the government computers automatically generate payments.  The fraudsters don’t only include healthcare professionals; it includes drug dealers and organized crimes units as well. </p>
<p>To aid is the prevention of fraud, healthcare applicants are being screened; the “high risk” applicants will be subjected to background checks and fingerprinting.  The computer programs are being revamped with new software programs which make them less vulnerable.  Hoping to deter people from these scams are tougher federal sentencing guidelines for crimes that involve more than $1 million in losses. </p>
<p>Although there may be a few skeptics, Max Baucus, Senate Finance Committee Chairman, said their efforts are already paying off.  Last year the government recovered about $4 billion in losses. </p>
<p>For more information see:  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/13/us-usa-healthcare-fraud-idUSTRE73C2HX20110413">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/13/us-usa-healthcare-fraud-idUSTRE73C2HX20110413</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Ffighting-fraud&amp;linkname=Fighting%20Fraud"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/fighting-fraud/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Contractor to Pay $69 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/government-contractor-to-pay-69-million</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/government-contractor-to-pay-69-million#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 5, 2010, an engineering contractor, Louis Berger Group, Inc. (“LBG”), agreed to pay over $69 million to settle claims of defrauding the U.S. Government related to reconstruction contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan.  LBG is a New Jersey-based engineering consulting company which performed engineering contracts for the U.S. Department of Defense and United States [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On November 5, 2010, an engineering contractor, Louis Berger Group, Inc. (“LBG”), agreed to pay over $69 million to settle claims of defrauding the U.S. Government related to reconstruction contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan.  LBG is a New Jersey-based engineering consulting company which performed engineering contracts for the U.S. Department of Defense and United States Agency for International Development in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The allegations, which resulted in civil and criminal charges, stemmed from an overbilling scheme uncovered by a whistleblower at the firm.  An investigation began in 2006 when a senior LBG financial analyst and auditor, Harold Salomon, filed a whistleblower lawsuit under seal accusing LBG of illegally billing the U.S. Government for costs not directly attributable to its work in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The overbilling included legal and accounting fees, rent, and other general company costs related to LBG’s offices in New Jersey and Washington D.C.  LBG and government officials agreed upon a settlement whereby LBG would pay $18.7 million in criminal penalties and $50.6 million to resolve civil claims. </p>
<p>For more information see:  <a href="http://alturl.com/89ahp">http://alturl.com/89ahp</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Fgovernment-contractor-to-pay-69-million&amp;linkname=Government%20Contractor%20to%20Pay%20%2469%20Million"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/government-contractor-to-pay-69-million/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Furuno USA settles qui tam claims over its navigation equipment</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/furuno-usa-settles-qui-tam-claims-over-its-navigation-equipment</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/furuno-usa-settles-qui-tam-claims-over-its-navigation-equipment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Furuno USA, settled a qui tam lawsuit against it for supplying electronic equipment to the US Coast Guard and Navy that was manufactured in China in violation of the Federal Trade Agreements Act. The government claimed that Furuno continued to provide Chinese navigation equipment even after it was advised that the equipment could not be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Furuno USA, settled a qui tam lawsuit against it for supplying electronic equipment to the US Coast Guard and Navy that was manufactured in China in violation of the Federal Trade Agreements Act. The government claimed that Furuno continued to provide Chinese navigation equipment even after it was advised that the equipment could not be manufactured in China. In addition to the nearly $700,000 settlement, Furuno agreed to pay $95,000 in attorney fees to the relator. The relator&#8217;s share of the settlement is approximately $159, 864.</p>
<p>For more information se: <a href="http://wireupdate.com/wires/9085/us-reach-695000-settlement-with-furuno-usa-in-dispute-over-navigation-equipment/">http://wireupdate.com/wires/9085/us-reach-695000-settlement-with-furuno-usa-in-dispute-over-navigation-equipment/</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Ffuruno-usa-settles-qui-tam-claims-over-its-navigation-equipment&amp;linkname=Furuno%20USA%20settles%20qui%20tam%20claims%20over%20its%20navigation%20equipment"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/furuno-usa-settles-qui-tam-claims-over-its-navigation-equipment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle Faces Whistleblower Lawsuit for Overcharging U.S. Government</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/oracle-faces-whistleblower-lawsuit-for-overcharing-u-s-government</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/oracle-faces-whistleblower-lawsuit-for-overcharing-u-s-government#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Oracle Corp., the world’s second- biggest software maker, faces a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower and the U.S. Justice Department claiming it overcharged the government by tens of millions of dollars.  Oracle failed to disclose discounts that it gave its most favored commercial customers, according to a complaint in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. 
 
Oracle, like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
Oracle Corp., the world’s second- biggest software maker, faces a lawsuit brought by a whistleblower and the U.S. Justice Department claiming it overcharged the government by tens of millions of dollars.  Oracle failed to disclose discounts that it gave its most favored commercial customers, according to a complaint in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Oracle, like thousands of others vendors, sold products to the United States Government through Multiple Award Schedule agreements, which are negotiated by the General Services Administration (GSA). Once companies secure such contracts, government agencies may order products on GSA schedules without going through elaborate procurement programs.  In return, the government is required by federal regulation to receive discounts equal to or greater than the discount given to that firm’s most favored customer, and contractors are supposed to report such discounts to the government.</div>
<div>
<p>The complaint alleges “various schemes Oracle used to give commercial customers deeper discounts than the GSA schedule provided.”  Taxpayers “overpaid for each Oracle software product by the amount of discounts and reductions from other commercial pricing practices that should applied to each such purchase,” according to the complaint.</p></div>
<div>In October 2006, Oracle paid $98.5 million to settle a False Claims Act lawsuit over GSA Multiple Award Schedule pricing disclosures at PeopleSoft Inc., a software maker. Oracle bought PeopleSoft in January 2005 for $10.3 billion. PeopleSoft was accused of understating the discounts it provided to commercial customers, including one that got up to 74 percent off the listed price.</div>
<div>
<p>The case is U.S. v. Oracle Corp., 1:07-cv-00529, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria).</p></div>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Foracle-faces-whistleblower-lawsuit-for-overcharing-u-s-government&amp;linkname=Oracle%20Faces%20Whistleblower%20Lawsuit%20for%20Overcharging%20U.S.%20Government"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/oracle-faces-whistleblower-lawsuit-for-overcharing-u-s-government/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Houston School District Settles E-Rate False Claims Case</title>
		<link>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/houston-school-district-settles-e-rate-false-claims-case</link>
		<comments>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/houston-school-district-settles-e-rate-false-claims-case#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mam@pietragallo.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal False Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Houston Independent School District has agreed to relinquish millions of dollars in requests for federal funds and to pay a total of $850,000 as part of a civil settlement relating to allegations that the school district violated the False Claims Act in connection with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) E-Rate Program, the Justice Department recently announced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Houston Independent School District has agreed to relinquish millions of dollars in requests for federal funds and to pay a total of $850,000 as part of a civil settlement relating to allegations that the school district violated the False Claims Act in connection with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) E-Rate Program, the Justice Department recently announced.</p>
<p>The E-Rate program, which Congress created in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, provides funding for needy schools and libraries to connect to and utilize the Internet. Under the program, which is funded by fees collected from telephone users, schools apply for funds to pay for hardware and monthly connectivity service fees. The FCC oversees the E-Rate program.</p>
<p>The United States contended that the Houston Independent School District provided false information to the E-Rate program and otherwise violated the program&#8217;s requirements by engaging in non-competitive bidding practices for E-Rate contracts. The United States further alleged that school district officials received gratuities from technology vendors, including trips, meals and loans.</p>
<p>This settlement resolves a very interesting, novel False Claims Act case involving an FCC Program that has not received much attention prior to this lawsuit.  This settlement could cause additional suits to be filed against other school districts, as the public beomes more aware of schemes in impacting this Program.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com%2Fhouston-school-district-settles-e-rate-false-claims-case&amp;linkname=Houston%20School%20District%20Settles%20E-Rate%20False%20Claims%20Case"><img src="http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fraudwhistleblowersblog.com/houston-school-district-settles-e-rate-false-claims-case/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

